Skip to content

docs(agent-workflows): propose future Artifacts workspace#5241

Draft
mmabrouk wants to merge 1 commit into
big-agentsfrom
docs/artifacts
Draft

docs(agent-workflows): propose future Artifacts workspace#5241
mmabrouk wants to merge 1 commit into
big-agentsfrom
docs/artifacts

Conversation

@mmabrouk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Context

Agents can currently communicate through chat and bounded questionnaires, but there is no planned shared interactive surface for work such as a CRM, go-to-market board, or editable project object.

Changes

This design workspace proposes Artifacts as a future direction. An artifact is a sandboxed HTML, CSS, and JavaScript application in an agent mount. It persists user changes to its own files, which the agent can read on a later turn.

The proposal records:

  • the artifact directory and state-file model;
  • the isolated runtime and scoped-write boundary;
  • a future artifacts skill and build toolkit;
  • starter templates for CRM, go-to-market, project-board, and decision-canvas use cases;
  • an expandable playground work area beside the agent files.

No runtime, agent skill, toolkit, templates, or frontend behavior is implemented in this PR.

Tests / notes

  • Verified the final commit contains exactly five files under docs/design/agent-workflows/projects/artifacts/.
  • Ran git diff --check on the new workspace.
  • The repository-wide pre-commit hook was not used for the docs-only commit because unrelated API work currently fails ruff unused-import checks.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
agenta-documentation Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jul 11, 2026 9:40pm

Request Review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 36b0c368-81ca-4ca9-9254-4eb2010696d7

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/artifacts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@mmabrouk mmabrouk added the needs-review Agent updated; awaiting Mahmoud's review label Jul 11, 2026
@mmabrouk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

🤖 The AI agent says:

This is intentionally a future-only design PR. Please review the model, not an implementation. The main decisions to settle are:

  1. Should the first persistence interface mirror localStorage, support scoped relative fetch, or include both?
  2. Should the expandable Artifacts work area begin in the playground inspector, or be a persistent sibling of chat?

The proposal also assumes artifacts complement questionnaires: use an artifact for shared interactive work, and retain questionnaires for bounded structured answers.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-review Agent updated; awaiting Mahmoud's review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant