-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Cursor models survive key verification (last-known-good cache + surface-scoped discovery) #550
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1447cfc
Cursor models survive verification: last-known-good cache + passive warm
arul28 75edc42
Audit fixes: backoff for background model-cache warms
arul28 4e89bb0
Surface-scoped cursor model discovery (sdk vs cli)
arul28 c12fd5d
ship: tests, docs, and TUI cursorSource parity for the cursor model fix
arul28 7994f24
ship: iteration 1 — address Greptile P2s (droid warm flag, explicit c…
arul28 1c58a12
ship: iteration 2 — authoritative empty Cursor probe no longer serves…
arul28 5209711
ship: iteration 3 — drop stale SDK cache on an authoritative empty probe
arul28 53a372d
ship: iteration 4 — scope returned Cursor models to the requested source
arul28 1c0d000
ship: iteration 5 — track cursor catalog freshness per discovery source
arul28 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When a caller requests
cursorSource: "sdk"(TUI/mobile chat surfaces),probeCliis false but this still readscached-or-fallbackCLI descriptors, so any last-known-good CLI-only rows are merged into the returned model list. Those callers run Cursor through the SDK and do not all apply the desktopcursorAvailabilityModefilter, so a user can pick a CLI-only model that later fails inassertCursorChatModelCanUseSdk; the same leak can happen in the opposite direction forcursorSource: "cli". Filter the merged descriptors by the requested source, or use the skipped source only to annotate availability, not as selectable rows.Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.