Skip to content

[ENH](foundation-api): Add granola collection#7362

Draft
dbeglord wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dbld/granola-source-collection
Draft

[ENH](foundation-api): Add granola collection#7362
dbeglord wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dbld/granola-source-collection

Conversation

@dbeglord

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of changes

Summarize the changes made by this PR.

  • Improvements & Bug fixes
    • ...
  • New functionality
    • ...

Test plan

How are these changes tested?

  • Tests pass locally with pytest for python, yarn test for js, cargo test for rust

Migration plan

Are there any migrations, or any forwards/backwards compatibility changes needed in order to make sure this change deploys reliably?

Observability plan

What is the plan to instrument and monitor this change?

Documentation Changes

Are all docstrings for user-facing APIs updated if required? Do we need to make documentation changes in the docs section?

Add "granola" to FoundationConfig's default source-collections list so
`/init` ensures the FOUNDATION/granola collection, stamps the
chunk-sibling grouping flag on it, and attaches the http_generate
function (output = wiki) — the same wiring slack, notion, and gdrive
already get. This lets the backend-driven Granola sync source (see the
Granola Source ADR) land notes that synthesize into the wiki and order
their end-of-job marker correctly.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Reviewer Checklist

Please leverage this checklist to ensure your code review is thorough before approving

Testing, Bugs, Errors, Logs, Documentation

  • Can you think of any use case in which the code does not behave as intended? Have they been tested?
  • Can you think of any inputs or external events that could break the code? Is user input validated and safe? Have they been tested?
  • If appropriate, are there adequate property based tests?
  • If appropriate, are there adequate unit tests?
  • Should any logging, debugging, tracing information be added or removed?
  • Are error messages user-friendly?
  • Have all documentation changes needed been made?
  • Have all non-obvious changes been commented?

System Compatibility

  • Are there any potential impacts on other parts of the system or backward compatibility?
  • Does this change intersect with any items on our roadmap, and if so, is there a plan for fitting them together?

Quality

  • Is this code of a unexpectedly high quality (Readability, Modularity, Intuitiveness)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@blacksmith-sh

blacksmith-sh Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Found 1 test failure on Blacksmith runners:

Failure

Test View Logs
test_count_to_file_async_attached_function_counts_late_inputs View Logs

Fix in Cursor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant