client: names in compact output when listing resources

[flxzt]

Description

This adds that resources names are printed in the compact output of the labgrid-client resources command.

For example, instead of:

exporter-01/usbhub-p01/NetworkSerialPort
exporter-01/usbhub-p01/NetworkSerialPort

the output becomes

exporter-01/usbhub-p01/NetworkSerialPort[/modbus]
exporter-01/usbhub-p01/NetworkSerialPort[/serial-115200]

which makes it easier to differentiate between resources that have the same class.

The alternative would be to enable verbose printing with labgrid-client -v resources, but that adds a lot of other information and makes is quite hard to pick out the name quickly.

At least in my experience the resource name is the only info that I need 95% of the time, so I think it would be beneficial to add it to the default output.

What do you think?

• PR has been tested

[Bastian-Krause]

Sounds good. Is there a special reason for the square brackets? I would just drop them, so the match can be copy & pasted into labgrid-client add-match <match> directly.

[flxzt]

I went with the brackets because they indicate that the name is optional when adding as a match and for consistency to the verbose output.

I don't have a strong opinion about either, should the verbose output be changed as well?

[flxzt]

I would appreciate feedback here.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 46.0%. Comparing base (5818762) to head (37d7d22).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
labgrid/remote/client.py	0.0%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #1443   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    46.0%   46.0%           
======================================
  Files         180     180           
  Lines       14462   14462           
======================================
  Hits         6654    6654           
  Misses       7808    7808           

Flag	Coverage Δ
3.10	46.0% <0.0%> (ø)
3.11	46.0% <0.0%> (ø)
3.12	?
3.13	45.9% <0.0%> (ø)
3.14	45.9% <0.0%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.