fix(user): migrate lastReultHashes to lastResultHashes safely (@Tryhard-source)

[Tryhard-source]

Implements the changes requested in #7830.

This PR migrates the legacy lastReultHashes field to lastResultHashes using a soft migration approach to avoid requiring a full database migration.

Changes:

• Add lastResultHashes to DBUser
• Keep legacy lastReultHashes for backward compatibility
• Read from lastResultHashes ?? lastReultHashes ?? []
• Write to lastResultHashes
• Unset lastReultHashes on update
• Add migration logic in migrateUser

This ensures existing user data remains compatible while gradually moving to the corrected schema.

Related issues:

• fix(user): migrate lastReultHashes typo to lastResultHashes safely (@mukundangopalachary) #7830
• Possible typo in "lastReultHashes" field name #8051

[github-actions]

Continuous integration check(s) failed. Please review the failing check's logs and make the necessary changes.

[github-actions]

Continuous integration check(s) failed. Please review the failing check's logs and make the necessary changes.

[xNoerPlaysCodes]

I'm not a maintainer or a contributor but fwiw this LGTM.

[fehmer]

hi @Tryhard-source,

please revert the unrelated changes in the markdown files.

[socket-security]

No dependency changes detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

👍 No dependency changes detected in pull request

[Tryhard-source]

hi @Tryhard-source,

please revert the unrelated changes in the markdown files.

Cleaned up the PR changes... there were some unintended formatting changes. (likely from Prettier)

I’ve reverted those and reduced the diff to only the intended backend change (fixing lastResultHashes typo + migrating legacy field). The PR now contains only the relevant changes. Thanks!

[fehmer]

Please check all my comments from the first review

[github-actions]

Continuous integration check(s) failed. Please review the failing check's logs and make the necessary changes.

[Tryhard-source]

Addressed the remaining review comments and fixed the lint issue.

[fehmer]

hi @Tryhard-source ,

i removed the last usage of the old property with the typo and both properties from the user response, please have a look.

[Tryhard-source]

@fehmer Looks good to me. Thanks!