Fix for OCPBUGS-98164: CVE-2026-13676

[germanparente]

Summary

• Fixes CVE-2026-13676: security policy bypass via improper Unicode hostname canonicalization in fast-uri (CVSS 7.5)
• Adds fast-uri override pinned to 3.1.3 in web/package.json (preventive — current dependency tree uses uri-js via ajv 6.12.6, but the override ensures protection if a future dependency update introduces fast-uri)
• Follows established CVE fix pattern (npm overrides)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[openshift-ci-robot]

@germanparente: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98164, which is invalid:

• release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
• expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98164 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.19.0, 4.19.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

• Fixes CVE-2026-13676: security policy bypass via improper Unicode hostname canonicalization in fast-uri (CVSS 7.5)
• Adds fast-uri override pinned to 3.1.3 in web/package.json (preventive — current dependency tree uses uri-js via ajv 6.12.6, but the override ensures protection if a future dependency update introduces fast-uri)
• Follows established CVE fix pattern (npm overrides)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: germanparente
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign zhuje for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[jgbernalp]

@germanparente was npm install executed here, i see no changes on the package-lock.json which means the override might not be needed

[germanparente]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@germanparente: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98164, which is invalid:

• release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[germanparente]

@jgbernalp you are right. It was preventive but the best would be to close this PR and mark jira as not a bug. Apologies for the noise and thanks a lot for your review.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@germanparente: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98164. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

• Fixes CVE-2026-13676: security policy bypass via improper Unicode hostname canonicalization in fast-uri (CVSS 7.5)
• Adds fast-uri override pinned to 3.1.3 in web/package.json (preventive — current dependency tree uses uri-js via ajv 6.12.6, but the override ensures protection if a future dependency update introduces fast-uri)
• Follows established CVE fix pattern (npm overrides)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@germanparente: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98164, which is invalid:

• release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Summary

• Fixes CVE-2026-13676: security policy bypass via improper Unicode hostname canonicalization in fast-uri (CVSS 7.5)
• Adds fast-uri override pinned to 3.1.3 in web/package.json (preventive — current dependency tree uses uri-js via ajv 6.12.6, but the override ensures protection if a future dependency update introduces fast-uri)
• Follows established CVE fix pattern (npm overrides)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[germanparente]

@jgbernalp in fact, it's better to re-open. Since the CVE in 4.17 needs to be fixed, I would say this preventive commit could make sense. Do you agree ?

[openshift-ci]

@germanparente: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[germanparente]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@germanparente: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98164, which is invalid:

• release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[germanparente]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@germanparente: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98164, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.18.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.z)
• bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
• release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
• dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-94010 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
• dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-94010 targets the "4.19.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.19.0, 4.19.z
• bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @germanparente

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: germanparente.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

Details

In response to this:

@germanparente: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98164, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.18.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.z)
• bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
• release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
• dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-94010 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
• dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-94010 targets the "4.19.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.19.0, 4.19.z
• bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @germanparente

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.