Skip to content

AMS#8062

Open
asmaems411-411 wants to merge 1 commit into
prisma:mainfrom
asmaems411-411:patch-1
Open

AMS#8062
asmaems411-411 wants to merge 1 commit into
prisma:mainfrom
asmaems411-411:patch-1

Conversation

@asmaems411-411

@asmaems411-411 asmaems411-411 commented Jul 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the Prisma schema examples for PostgreSQL and MongoDB.
    • Replaced the MongoDB sample data model with expanded user, subscription, authentication, lead, messaging, appointment, and knowledge entities.
    • Revised relationships, defaults, identifiers, timestamps, and field types throughout the examples.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jul 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@asmaems411-411 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Prisma Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

Walkthrough

Changes

Prisma schema documentation

Layer / File(s) Summary
PostgreSQL datasource example
apps/docs/content/docs/orm/prisma-schema/overview/index.mdx
Updates the datasource block to use the PostgreSQL provider.
MongoDB schema model example
apps/docs/content/docs/orm/prisma-schema/overview/index.mdx
Replaces the previous User, Post, and Role definitions with expanded User, Lead, Message, Appointment, and Knowledge models and their relations.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title is too vague to convey the Prisma schema documentation changes in this pull request. Use a short, specific title that names the main change, such as the Prisma schema doc update or the new MongoDB example models.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Warning

⚠️ This pull request has been flagged as potential spam (vandalism) by CodeRabbit slop detection and should be reviewed carefully.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@apps/docs/content/docs/orm/prisma-schema/overview/index.mdx`:
- Line 17: Update the createdAt field in the Prisma schema example to use the
valid case-sensitive DateTime scalar instead of datetime, matching the existing
type usage in the surrounding model.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a0de600e-d20e-46b1-b503-d15268095769

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fb5c8ca and 3f196b5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/docs/content/docs/orm/prisma-schema/overview/index.mdx

passwordHash String?
stripeCustomerId String? @unique
subscriptionPlan String @default("STARTER") // STARTER, PROFESSIONAL, AGENCY
createdAt datetime @default(now())

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Fix invalid Prisma type: datetime should be DateTime.

Line 17 uses datetime (lowercase), which is not a valid Prisma scalar type. Prisma type names are case-sensitive — the correct type is DateTime, as correctly used on line 18 and in every other model in this schema. A user copying this example would hit a schema validation error.

🔧 Proposed fix
-  createdAt        datetime      `@default`(now())
+  createdAt        DateTime      `@default`(now())
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
createdAt datetime @default(now())
createdAt DateTime `@default`(now())
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@apps/docs/content/docs/orm/prisma-schema/overview/index.mdx` at line 17,
Update the createdAt field in the Prisma schema example to use the valid
case-sensitive DateTime scalar instead of datetime, matching the existing type
usage in the surrounding model.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant