Remove snakemake from comparison

[jan-janssen]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated comparison tables to better focus on key frameworks: executorlib, concurrent.futures, Dask, Parsl, and Ray
  • Clarified Parsl's support status for Drop-in Executor API to provide more accurate information
  • Streamlined documentation by removing Snakemake and simplifying the comparison structure for improved navigation

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@jan-janssen, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 5 minutes and 10 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0394de92-bd01-4e9c-bc3e-765c6067de37

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 30456db and b082981.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• README.md
• docs/comparison.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This PR removes Snakemake from executorlib's comparison documentation across README and docs/comparison.md. The Snakemake column is dropped from both comparison tables, and the dedicated Snakemake section is removed from the detailed documentation. Additionally, Parsl's "Drop-in Executor API" status is updated to ⚠️ in the detailed comparison.

Changes

Snakemake Removal from Documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Remove Snakemake from README README.md	Snakemake column removed from the "Key Features" comparison table (lines 29–36) and the Snakemake link removed from the "Documentation → Comparison" section (lines 158–159).
Update comparison documentation and Parsl status docs/comparison.md	Snakemake column removed from the "At a glance" table, Parsl's "Drop-in Executor API" status changed from ❌ to ⚠️ (lines 14–21), and the dedicated Snakemake section removed (lines 60–61).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 Out with Snakemake, the comparison clears,
Now Parsl shows caution after all these years,
Tables update, links realign with grace,
Executorlib shines in its rightful place! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'Remove snakemake from comparison' directly and clearly describes the main change: removing Snakemake from the comparison documentation.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch nosnake

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.16%. Comparing base (36659dc) to head (b082981).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #994   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.16%   94.16%           
=======================================
  Files          39       39           
  Lines        2090     2090           
=======================================
  Hits         1968     1968           
  Misses        122      122           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.