Skip to content

Update triage party configuration#8080

Open
mhucka wants to merge 26 commits into
quantumlib:mainfrom
mhucka:update-triage-party
Open

Update triage party configuration#8080
mhucka wants to merge 26 commits into
quantumlib:mainfrom
mhucka:update-triage-party

Conversation

@mhucka
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mhucka mhucka commented May 15, 2026

This updates our Triage Party configuration in various ways. On the web page itself:

  • Update the title of the Triage Party page
  • Change the overall look and feel, particularly the color scheme
  • Remove some sections we rarely use and do other navigation cleanup
  • Remove the "reactions" column from the table
  • Remove some of the Triage Party tags used where they are redundant
  • Change the titles of all Triage Party tags to be more understandable
  • Make other changes here and there

Internally, in the configuration files of dev_tools/triage-party/:

  • Refactor config files to follow current practices, for example to use Kustomize, a config.yaml file, and more
  • Put custom CSS code in a custom.css file
  • Add a favicon icon (using the Cirq logo)
  • Expand the README.md file to match the current scheme and add much more info to help future maintainers

mhucka added 8 commits April 29, 2026 03:19
When using it in a group setting such as during Cirq Cynq, 5 minutes
turns out to be a long time.
Changes:

* Use the title "Quantum AI"
* Update the list of members
* Improve the titles of sections
* Remove or comment out sections we haven't been using lately
* Make various other tweaks
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the size: L 250< lines changed <1000 label May 15, 2026
@mhucka
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mhucka commented May 15, 2026

Screenshots for documentation:

  • Front/landing page
Screenshot 2026-05-15 at 2 56 49 PM
  • Issue triage page:
Screenshot 2026-05-15 at 2 57 14 PM
  • Issue discoverability page:
Screenshot 2026-05-15 at 2 58 03 PM

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 15, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.60%. Comparing base (4738170) to head (608d3e7).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8080   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.60%   99.60%           
=======================================
  Files        1118     1118           
  Lines      100957   100957           
=======================================
  Hits       100557   100557           
  Misses        400      400           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mhucka mhucka marked this pull request as ready for review May 15, 2026 22:40
@mhucka mhucka requested a review from a team as a code owner May 15, 2026 22:40
@mhucka mhucka requested a review from senecameeks May 15, 2026 22:40
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@pavoljuhas pavoljuhas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM after addressing comments. Would it be possible to have a staging deployment so the new config could be tested side-by-side with the current one? (only if easy to do)

Thanks for improving this!

Comment thread dev_tools/triage-party/kubernetes/02_deployment/configmap.yaml Outdated
Comment thread dev_tools/triage-party/kubernetes/02_deployment/configmap.yaml Outdated
Comment thread dev_tools/triage-party/kubernetes/02_deployment/deployment.yaml
@mhucka
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mhucka commented Jun 1, 2026

Would it be possible to have a staging deployment so the new config could be tested side-by-side with the current one? (only if easy to do)

Staging on GCP is probably possible for someone who is more familiar with Kubernetes & GCP, but unfortunately I'm not familiar enough with it that it would be easy to do for me :-(.

However, it should be possible to run Triage Party in a Docker container (T.P. has a 3 line example of doing that on their front README.md file). It requires changing the configuration a little bit, though; for some reason the Cirq config files are not organized the same way as in their example. I'll give it a short try.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added size: XL lines changed >1000 and removed size: L 250< lines changed <1000 labels Jun 2, 2026
@mhucka
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mhucka commented Jun 2, 2026

Update:

  • fixed the favicon issue
  • overhauled the configuration further
  • figured out how to run a local copy of Triage Party and added a script run-local.sh to do it
  • expanded the README.md file to explain it all

…ate-triage-party

# Conflicts:
#	dev_tools/triage-party/kubernetes/02_deployment/configmap.yaml
@mhucka mhucka force-pushed the update-triage-party branch from 63e9dc8 to d30420d Compare June 2, 2026 04:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size: XL lines changed >1000

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants