Skip to content

Add IP and Resource Sync proposal document#2153

Open
geetikabatra wants to merge 3 commits into
rackerlabs:mainfrom
geetikabatra:geetikabatra-patch-1
Open

Add IP and Resource Sync proposal document#2153
geetikabatra wants to merge 3 commits into
rackerlabs:mainfrom
geetikabatra:geetikabatra-patch-1

Conversation

@geetikabatra

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This document outlines the proposal for IP and Resource Sync (ipsync) between Nautobot and Undercloud sites, detailing the motivation, goals, requirements, and implementation plans for achieving two-way synchronization of IPs and VLANs.

This document outlines the proposal for IP and Resource Sync (ipsync) between Nautobot and Undercloud sites, detailing the motivation, goals, requirements, and implementation plans for achieving two-way synchronization of IPs and VLANs.
Removed an alternative consideration regarding full two-way sync due to potential sync loops.

@cardoe cardoe left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall I agree here. This is written up like a ADR (which is great). We should have a section for these in the docs so that it'll pass.

Comment thread docs/IpSyncProposal.md

This isn't settled yet, and it decides how the site talks to the operator:

- **If sites can reach the management cluster's API directly:** no new plumbing needed. The site just runs a scoped Kubernetes client (limited to its own site's CRs) reading `spec` and writing `status`.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well the management cluster is the ArgoCD / logging environment. Not where Nautobot is running. The sites can reach the global cluster where Nautobot and Nautobot operator are running.

Comment thread docs/IpSyncProposal.md

#### Subtasks

- Confirm with Abhimanyu/Haseeb whether sites can reach the management cluster directly (blocks the interface design).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just want to check which cluster you mean

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants