Skip to content

vts: rename propagation field#817

Merged
feiyang3cat merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
vts-rename-propagation
Jul 9, 2026
Merged

vts: rename propagation field#817
feiyang3cat merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
vts-rename-propagation

Conversation

@feiyang3cat

@feiyang3cat feiyang3cat commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What changed?
in TimeSkippingConfig message, disable_child_propagation was changed to disable_propagation

Why?
this field should be generic than being specific to one execution type

Breaking changes
yes just for static code dependence

Server PR
temporalio/temporal#10940

@feiyang3cat feiyang3cat requested review from a team July 6, 2026 20:56
@feiyang3cat feiyang3cat changed the title change to generic disable_propagation vts: change to generic disable_propagation Jul 6, 2026
@feiyang3cat feiyang3cat changed the title vts: change to generic disable_propagation vts: rename propagation field Jul 6, 2026
@simvlad

simvlad commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

But we still propagate for chain of runs, correct?

@feiyang3cat feiyang3cat force-pushed the vts-rename-propagation branch from b80d564 to 95a0114 Compare July 9, 2026 18:01
@feiyang3cat feiyang3cat force-pushed the vts-rename-propagation branch from 6d566bf to fcc8f43 Compare July 9, 2026 19:13
@feiyang3cat feiyang3cat enabled auto-merge (squash) July 9, 2026 19:13
@feiyang3cat feiyang3cat merged commit 320af82 into main Jul 9, 2026
4 checks passed
@feiyang3cat feiyang3cat deleted the vts-rename-propagation branch July 9, 2026 19:16
feiyang3cat added a commit to temporalio/temporal that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2026
## What changed?
the server changes for an api field rename
temporalio/api#817

## How did you test it?
- [x] built
- [ ] run locally and tested manually
- [x] covered by existing tests
- [ ] added new unit test(s)
- [x] added new functional test(s)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants